According to Verheyden, they’ve met with UEFA to urge a review of the matter under Article 74 of UEFA’s regulations, which states that clubs must have “no overdue payables” by March 31 prior to the licensing season. “After hearing yet another fantastic story from a parallel universe today, PSG still fails to understand why Kylian MBAPPE has not taken his case to the Conseil des Prud’hommes (labor court), the only court competent to rule on the dispute with his former club,” the statement begins. On the contrary, PSG considers him an employee like any other and believes he must honor the clear and repeated commitments—both public and private—that he made to his employer, even though he benefited from unprecedented advantages from the club during his seven years in Paris.
Author: Dante Gonzalez
Published at: 2025-04-12 22:30:27
Still want to read the full version? Full article
